Time to be disruptive in class

The disruption first brought on by the computer and then the Internet is reaching far into our society and isn’t nearly done yet. But there are fewer and fewer holdouts.

Even healthcare

“Doctors will never move away from paper.” Working in healthcare, I heard that phrase said many times. It was true until it wasn’t. The move wasn’t spontaneous, though…they needed to be incented by carrots and sticks provided by first the American Recovery Act and then by the Healthcare Reform bill. The unthinkable happened because the incentives made it happen.

Flying home from Paris today we sat next to a Harvard professor that teaches presentation skills. He was remarkably knowledgeable about how to reach people effectively. He showed us samples that surprised us and started our heads spinning. Once you see education done well using technology, there’s no going back.

What if education…

What if education could be fundamentally changed by the way we teach? The professor showed us how five minutes done well can convey more information and meaning than fifty minutes of droning instruction. He showed us his actual class lessons done with video embedded in Apple’s Keynote. It engaged us visually and mentally. The presentations made connections in our brain that no one can talk you into.

Despite new teaching tools like electronic whiteboards and computers in classrooms, learning hasn’t fundamentally changed from where it started eons ago. We still put an instructor in front of a class, talking through ideas while students scribble notes. Maybe they type. It is an industrial-age throwback. It is a factory approach to learning that becomes less relevant to the skills required to survive in the real world, where information is always at your fingertips and adaptability and creativity are the truly valuable prize.

But the incentives would need to show up. As it stands, changing a venerable profession won’t be taken lightly. Beyond teacher’s unions and red tape, there are generations of people who’ve contributed to our society based on the systems that were in place when they ‘came through’. It is very hard to give up what got you there.

But what happens when the geography of delivery completely changes as well? What if it doesn’t have to occur in a small or large lecture hall and doesn’t need to be in-person.

Khan Academy

We can start small. The Khan Academy shows us that there are approaches that change the paradigm and can be delivered anywhere. Rich visual images help students, “Learn almost everything for free.” Their goal isn’t to replace the traditional classroom with revolution, but with evolution toward a new way of learning.

Khan Academy’s site lists their vision as:

We’re a small team trying our best to improve the way the world learns. Too many people around the globe don’t have access to good education materials, or they are forced to learn through a system that doesn’t properly cater to their individual needs. We think the technology exists today to fundamentally change this, and we’re trying to build the tools and resources every student deserves.

Khan Academy isn’t the only way education will be disrupted, but it is an early effort to foster change. As our new professor friend told us, education needs to be brought into the real world and made relevant for every kind of student.

When incentives reward modernizing education, we can move toward better ways to educate. Those incentives may need to come from government as they did in healthcare. Without mandates (and funding) from outside it may take a while yet.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , ,

Categories: Disruption, Learning

Author:Jeanne Roué-Taylor

I'm fascinated by disruptive technology and its impact on our world. I manage sales operations for an excellent startup with a unique team of highly experienced data scientists.

Subscribe to the blog

Subscribe and receive an email when new articles are published

One Comment on “Time to be disruptive in class”

  1. November 15, 2012 at 2:04 pm #

    A lot of attention is currently on higher education reform due, in part, to the sky-rocketing costs of universities. However, we also need to address it at the primary school level. I read a statistic that by 4th grade, a third of boys and girls have lost an interest in science; by 8th grade, almost 50% have lost interest in STEM (Science Technology Engineering and Math) or deemed it irrelevant to their education or future plans. And yet, by 2018, 8 million jobs in the US Economy will require a college degree in STEM. Unless we also consider change in primary education, by the time our kids have the opportunity to experience higher education, it may be too late. Here’s a great paper that I read from the president of my school board on 21st century education: http://rosenblatt.org/blog/2012/09/20/what-does-21st-century-education-mean-anyway/
    We need to teach our children for their future and not our past.
    Catheryne, CEO and Co-founder of MommaZoo.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: